What is GEO? (Generative Engine Optimization)

"GEO" is an overloaded acronym. If you searched "what is geo," you might have meant geography, geotargeting, or a global employment organization. This page is about none of those.

GEO stands for generative engine optimization—the practice of making your content easy for AI search systems to trust, cite, and include as a source in their answers.

If your traffic plan depends on people clicking blue links, AI answers change the game. Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT with browsing, Perplexity, and similar tools now synthesize answers from multiple sources instead of showing a list of ten links. When that happens, "ranking" matters less than "being used."

This article will give you:

A plain-English definition (and the academic one)
Why GEO exists right now
How generative engines choose sources
What to do in your first 30–60 days
How to measure whether any of it worked

The term GEO is grounded in published research, not just tool marketing. A team from Princeton, Georgia Tech, IIT Delhi, and the Allen Institute published the foundational paper in 2023 (Aggarwal et al., arXiv), and it was presented at KDD 2024. We'll reference that work—and separate it from the buzzword version.

What does GEO mean in marketing?

GEO Definition: Generative engine optimization (GEO) is a set of techniques for improving how often your content is selected, used, and cited by AI-powered search engines and answer systems.

That's the short version. Here's the longer breakdown.

A "generative engine" is any AI system that synthesizes an answer from multiple sources instead of returning a list of links. Search Engine Land defines GEO as optimizing content "to improve its visibility in AI-driven search engines."

Examples of generative engines include:

Google AI Overviews (the AI-generated summaries at the top of search results)
ChatGPT with browsing (when it pulls live web sources)
Perplexity (search-first AI that cites sources inline)
Microsoft Copilot / Bing Chat (AI-augmented search)

GEO is not:

Geotargeting or geo-marketing (location-based advertising)
Geography (the study of places)
"Global employment organization" (a payroll term)

If someone says "we need a GEO strategy" in a marketing meeting, they almost certainly mean generative engine optimization.

The two definitions you'll see: academic vs. marketing

The academic definition comes from the original paper:

"We propose the first general creator-centric framework to optimize content for generative engines, which we dub Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)." — Aggarwal et al. (arXiv)

This framing treats GEO as a black-box optimization problem: you can't see inside the model, but you can test what inputs lead to better outputs (citations, visibility).

The marketing definition is simpler: GEO means optimizing your content so AI answers use it as a source. Foundation Inc. calls it "making your brand the answer, not just a search result."

Both definitions point to the same goal—getting cited in AI-generated responses. The academic version just comes with a research methodology attached.

Why GEO exists: AI answers and zero-click behavior

GEO isn't a marketing invention. It exists because distribution changed.

AI Overviews are everywhere now

Google's AI Overviews—the AI-generated answer boxes at the top of search results—are no longer a US experiment. Google announced in May 2025 that AI Overviews are now available in more than 200 countries and territories, in more than 40 languages.

That's not a test. That's the new default.

According to seoClarity research, AI Overviews appear for roughly 30% of US desktop keyword searches as of September 2025. For some categories (health, finance, how-to queries), the percentage is higher.

Clicks are getting harder to earn

When AI Overviews appear, click behavior changes. Ahrefs analyzed 300,000 keywords and found that the presence of an AI Overview correlated with a 34.5% lower average click-through rate (CTR) for the top-ranking page.

That doesn't mean traffic disappears. It means traffic concentrates differently. If the AI answer cites you, you may still get clicks. If it doesn't, you're invisible even when you rank.

Zero-click search isn't new—but it's accelerating

SparkToro's 2024 zero-click study found that for every 1,000 US Google searches, only 374 clicks go to the open web. The rest stay inside Google's ecosystem (maps, shopping, knowledge panels, or no click at all).

AI answers amplify this. When a user gets a synthesized answer with inline citations, they may never scroll to the organic results.

The shift is real. The question is: what do you do about it?

How generative engines choose sources

This is the mechanism—the "why" behind the tactics.

Generative engines don't rank pages. They synthesize answers from multiple sources, then (sometimes) cite those sources. Source selection is a black box, but patterns exist.

What the research found

The Princeton/Georgia Tech paper tested multiple optimization strategies and measured how often content appeared in AI-generated responses. Their finding:

"Through systematic evaluation, we demonstrate that our proposed Generative Engine Optimization methods can boost visibility by up to 40% on diverse queries." — Aggarwal et al. (arXiv)

That 40% number comes with caveats (specific metrics, controlled conditions), but the principle holds: what you do to your content affects whether AI uses it.

The strategies that worked best included:

Adding citations and statistics
Making claims explicit and attributable
Structuring content for easy extraction

The "citation surface area" concept

Here's a practical mental model: if a model can't extract a clean claim from your content, it's less likely to cite you.

Think of it like this. An LLM needs to:

Find relevant content
Extract a specific claim or fact
Attribute that claim to a source

If your page is a wall of text with no clear statements, step 2 fails. If your page has clear headings, short definitional sentences, and linked sources, the model has more "surface area" to grab.

Strapi's GEO guide frames this as building "interfaces for LLMs"—similar to how APIs expose clean endpoints for developers. Your content is the API; the model is the client.

Citation-ready content includes:

One-sentence definitions (quotable)
Statistics with sources (verifiable)
Short "how it works" explanations (extractable)
Clear entity references (unambiguous)

The more citation-ready your content, the more likely it appears in answers.

GEO vs SEO: what's the same, what changes

If you've done SEO for any length of time, you might be thinking: "This sounds like SEO with extra steps."

You're not wrong. And you're not alone.

What stays the same

Many classic SEO signals still matter for GEO:

Authority: Sites with strong backlink profiles and domain authority get cited more often
Relevance: Content needs to match the query intent
Quality: Thin, spammy, or low-value content gets filtered out
Structure: Clear headings, proper HTML, fast load times

If you're already doing solid SEO, you're not starting from zero.

What changes

The goal shifts. Traditional SEO optimizes for "rank high, get the click." GEO optimizes for "be included in the answer."

That sounds similar, but the mechanics differ:

Traditional SEO	GEO
Win position 1	Win a citation in the answer
Optimize for CTR	Optimize for extractability
One winner per SERP	Multiple sources per answer
Track rankings	Track referrals + citations

Measurement also changes. There's no universal "Search Console for ChatGPT." You can't see which queries triggered your citation or how often you appeared.

The practitioner view

Reddit's SEO communities are blunt about this. One thread on r/SEO put it plainly:

"GEO is just fancy harder to track SEO."

That's fair. GEO isn't a revolution—it's an adaptation. But "harder to track" is the key problem. Without measurement, you're guessing.

Some practitioners are also skeptical of the tools being sold under the GEO banner. A r/bigseo thread criticized "synthetic prompt" dashboards that claim to show how often your brand appears in AI answers. The concern: these tools run their own prompts, not real user queries, and the "visibility scores" may not reflect actual behavior.

The takeaway: GEO is real, but buyer beware on the tooling.

What tends to work in GEO

Based on the research and practitioner consensus, here's what actually moves the needle.

1. Add citations, quotations, and statistics

The Princeton study found that adding citations and statistics increased visibility in AI responses. This makes sense: models are trained to prefer verifiable claims.

Practical moves:

Link to primary sources (studies, official announcements, data sets)
Include specific numbers instead of vague claims
Quote experts by name and credential

2. Increase structure and extractability

AI systems parse structure. Clear headings, lists, and tables make it easier for a model to find and extract information.

AIOSEO's GEO checklist recommends:

Table of contents at the top
FAQ sections with clear Q&A pairs
Bulleted lists for multi-part answers
Definition boxes for key terms

3. Make claims explicit and attributable

Vague content doesn't get cited. If you say "studies show that X," say which studies. If you claim expertise, show credentials.

The more explicit your claims, the easier they are to extract.

4. Reduce fluff

Every sentence should either inform or persuade. Throat-clearing intros ("In this article, we'll explore...") add words without value.

High information density helps both readers and AI systems.

A "minimum viable GEO page" template

If you're starting from scratch, a citation-ready page includes:

One-sentence definition (first paragraph, quotable)
Short "how it works" section (mechanism, not just claims)
Supporting data (2–3 statistics with linked sources)
FAQ section (4–6 real questions, direct answers)
Clear entity references (who, what, where—unambiguous)

That's not a magic formula. It's a structure that makes your content easier to cite.

How to measure GEO today

Here's the hard truth: GEO measurement is immature. But that doesn't mean you're blind.

Tier 1: Referral traffic and conversions (most reliable)

The one metric you can actually trust: traffic that arrives from AI sources and converts.

In Google Analytics 4, look for referral traffic from:

chatgpt.com
perplexity.ai
bing.com (Copilot queries)
google.com (AI Overview clicks show as organic, but behavior differs)

Adobe Digital Insights reported that web traffic from AI-driven referrals increased more than tenfold in the US between July 2024 and February 2025. The volume is growing.

A practitioner on r/SEO put it simply:

"The one metric that really matters IMO is conversions coming from LLMs."

If AI referrals are converting, GEO is working. If they're not, you have a baseline to improve.

Tier 2: Controlled prompt monitoring (useful but noisy)

Some teams run a fixed set of prompts through ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews, then track whether their brand appears in responses.

This isn't perfect. Your prompts aren't user prompts. Responses vary by session. But over time, you can spot trends: "We went from appearing in 2/10 test queries to 6/10."

Keep the prompt set stable. Document the method. Don't over-index on small changes.

Tier 3: Third-party "visibility scores" (use with caution)

Several tools now offer "AI visibility scores" based on synthetic prompt testing. These can be useful for benchmarking, but the r/bigseo community has raised concerns:

Synthetic prompts don't reflect real user queries
"Visibility scores" are proprietary and hard to validate
Some tools charge enterprise prices for data you can't verify

If you use these tools, treat the scores as directional signals, not ground truth.

The measurement hierarchy

Start with Tier 1. Add Tier 2 if you have capacity. Be skeptical of Tier 3.

A 30–60 day starter playbook

You don't need to buy a tool on day one. Here's a lightweight action plan.

Week 1: Fix your citation surface area

Audit your top 10–20 pages for "citation readiness":

Do they have a one-sentence definition in the first paragraph?
Are claims explicit and sourced?
Is the structure clear (headings, lists, tables)?
Can a model extract a useful fact in one sentence?

Fix the low-hanging fruit. Add definitions, link sources, break up walls of text.

Week 2–3: Add credible proof points

For your most important pages:

Add 2–3 statistics from authoritative sources
Include at least one expert quote (with name and credential)
Link to primary sources (studies, official docs, data sets)

This isn't about stuffing pages with citations. It's about making your claims verifiable.

Week 4–6: Set up measurement

Configure GA4 to track AI referral sources. Create a simple dashboard:

Traffic from chatgpt.com, perplexity.ai, etc.
Conversions from those sources
Week-over-week trends

If you have capacity, start a controlled prompt monitoring log. Pick 10 queries relevant to your business. Test them monthly. Track whether you appear.

Week 6–8: Build off-site validation (carefully)

AI systems pull from sources beyond your website: Reddit, Quora, YouTube, comparison articles, reviews.

Legitimate off-site work includes:

Contributing to relevant discussions (Reddit AMAs, Quora answers)
Earning mentions in comparison articles and listicles
Building backlinks from authoritative sources

Warning: Some practitioners are gaming this badly. A r/marketing thread called out "disguised promotion on Reddit for the sake of GEO." Don't be that brand. Community platforms detect and punish spam. Build presence by being useful, not by faking it.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does GEO stand for?

GEO stands for generative engine optimization. It refers to optimizing content so AI-powered search engines (like Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, and Perplexity) are more likely to cite it in their responses.

The term was coined in a 2023 research paper by researchers from Princeton, Georgia Tech, IIT Delhi, and the Allen Institute. Search Engine Land and other industry publications have since adopted the term.

Is GEO just SEO with a new name?

GEO overlaps with SEO, but the goal is different. SEO optimizes for ranking and clicks. GEO optimizes for being cited inside AI-generated answers.

Many SEO fundamentals still apply (authority, relevance, quality). But GEO adds new considerations: extractability, citation-ready structure, and measurement challenges. As one r/SEO commenter put it, "GEO is just fancy harder to track SEO." Fair point—but "harder to track" is exactly why it needs its own playbook.

Why are people talking about GEO now?

Because AI answer experiences are expanding. Google's AI Overviews now appear in 200+ countries. Ahrefs found that AI Overviews correlate with a 34.5% lower CTR for the top-ranking page.

When AI answers reduce clicks, "ranking" matters less than "being cited." That's the shift driving GEO interest.

How do I measure GEO results?

Start with what you can actually track: referral traffic and conversions from AI sources (ChatGPT, Perplexity, etc.) in your analytics.

For more granularity, run controlled prompt tests: pick 10 queries, test them monthly in AI tools, track whether your brand appears. Treat third-party "visibility scores" with skepticism—they're based on synthetic prompts, not real user queries.

The r/SEO community is blunt about measurement pain. Focus on conversions first.

Do I need a GEO tool?

Not on day one. Structure, proof, and measurement basics come first. Many "GEO tools" charge enterprise prices for data you can't verify.

The r/bigseo community has criticized synthetic prompt dashboards that show "visibility scores" without transparency on methodology. If you evaluate tools later, ask: what prompts are they running? How do they define "visibility"? Can you validate the data independently?

The bottom line on GEO

GEO isn't a gimmick. It's a response to a real shift: AI answers are replacing click-through results for a growing share of queries.

The core idea is simple: make your content easy to trust and cite. That means structure, proof, and clarity—the same things that make content useful for humans.

Here's what to remember:

GEO means generative engine optimization—optimizing for AI citations, not just rankings
The shift is real: AI Overviews are in 200+ countries, and CTR drops when they appear
Start with structure and proof: definitions, statistics, clear headings, linked sources
Measure what you can: AI referral traffic and conversions first, prompt monitoring second, "visibility scores" with skepticism
Build presence, not spam: off-site validation matters, but gaming Reddit or Quora will backfire

GEO is about earning a spot in the answer, not just a rank in the results. The brands that figure this out early will own the citations. The ones that don't will wonder where their traffic went.

Ready to see where you stand?

Check if your brand appears in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews →

Want to stay current as AI search evolves?

Get our monthly AI Search Updates →