What is GEO? Generative Engine Optimization (in plain English)
GEO is optimizing content to get cited in AI answers (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews). Definition, mechanism, measurement, and checklist.
Author

What is GEO? Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)
When an AI summary appears in search results, users click on traditional links just 8% of the time — compared to 15% when there's no AI answer. The click economy is compressing.
If you run a brand that depends on organic traffic, this shift changes what "winning" looks like. Ranking #1 used to be the goal. Now the goal is getting cited inside the AI answer itself.
That's where GEO comes in.
This guide will give you a plain-English definition of generative engine optimization, explain the mechanism behind how AI selects sources, and hand you an operator checklist for what to change first. Plus: how to measure GEO without fooling yourself.
What is GEO (generative engine optimization)?
GEO Definition: Generative engine optimization is the process of optimizing your content so generative AI engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, etc.) select and cite your page as a source in their answers.
That definition sounds simple, but notice what it doesn't say. It doesn't say "rank higher." It says "get selected and cited."
The unit of visibility has changed. In classic SEO, the unit was the ranking position. In GEO, the unit is the answer — and whether your brand appears as a source inside it.
According to Search Engine Land: "GEO stands for 'generative engine optimization' which means the process of optimizing your website's content to boost its visibility in AI-driven search engines."
Research from Princeton and Georgia Tech found that GEO techniques can boost visibility by up to 40% in generative engine responses. This isn't theoretical. It's measurable.
A practical definition for operators
Here's a simpler way to think about it: GEO means making your content easy to extract, safe to cite, and hard to ignore.
But GEO isn't only about your website. If the engine trusts Wikipedia or Reddit more than you, it will cite them — even if your content is better. That's why GEO includes both on-page structure and off-site authority signals.
For a deeper exploration, see The Definitive Guide to GEO.
Why does GEO exist? AI answers are assembled, not ranked
In classic search, Google ranked ten blue links. You competed for position.
In AI search, the engine does something different. It parses pages into smaller pieces, retrieves candidate sources, and assembles an answer. The output isn't a list of links — it's a synthesized response with citations.
This matters because the win condition changed. Microsoft Advertising put it clearly: "In today's world of AI search, it's not just about being found, it's about being selected."
The mechanism behind AI Overviews involves what Google calls "query fan-out" — one user query triggers multiple related searches behind the scenes. Your content needs to answer not just the obvious question, but the adjacent questions the engine is also looking for.
According to Google Search Central: "There are no additional requirements to appear in AI Overviews or AI Mode, nor other special optimizations necessary."
Translation: you don't need a special trick. You need clean, extractable content that answers questions directly.
Candidate set vs. cited set
Here's a useful mental model:
- Candidate set: Sources the engine can retrieve. You get here through crawlability, topical relevance, and baseline authority.
- Cited set: Sources the engine actually cites inside the answer. You get here through evidence, clarity, and trust.
Being in the candidate set is table stakes. Getting into the cited set is the game.
What makes AI cite one page and ignore another?
Once you're eligible to be retrieved, what actually determines whether the engine cites you?
The arXiv GEO paper tested this directly:
"Including citations, quotations from relevant sources, and statistics can significantly boost source visibility, with an increase of over 40% across various queries."
In one experiment, adding citations to content increased visibility by 115.1% for sources that previously ranked fifth. That's a dramatic lift from a structural change.
The pattern: evidence beats adjectives. AI engines can reuse facts, statistics, and quotes. They can't reuse "our industry-leading solution."
The "evidence packet" pattern
If you want AI to cite your page, make it easy. Build what we call an "evidence packet" — a self-contained block of extractable information:
- Definition box: A clear, direct definition near the top
- Key facts table: Terms, metrics, constraints in structured format
- 1-2 statistics with sources: Machine-readable proof points
- 1-2 quotes with attribution: Expert voices the engine can reference
- Clear headings that match questions: Section titles that mirror what users ask
This isn't about gaming the system. It's about being useful to the system.
Why off-site mentions matter
Analysis of 8,000 AI citations revealed that ChatGPT citations skew heavily toward Wikipedia (27% of citations), while Google AI Overviews lean on Reddit as the most-cited single site.
AI engines cite what they already trust. If your brand exists only on your own website, you're invisible to the parts of the web AI leans on most.
How do you do GEO? A high-leverage checklist
Start with one cornerstone page per topic. Make it the best answer available on that question. Then extend your presence across the surfaces AI actually trusts.
A Go Fish Digital case study documented this approach: +43% growth in monthly AI-driven traffic and a 25X higher conversion rate from AI-driven leads compared to traditional search.
The concept of "citation velocity" — how quickly AI models start citing your content — matters too. Conductor defines it as "how quickly AI models and other platforms cite your content." Faster velocity usually correlates with stronger authority signals.
On-page checklist: make your content citable
Structure for extraction:
- Add an explicit definition block near the top (use a blockquote or bolded definition)
- Break content into clear H2/H3 sections that match question patterns
- Add a "key facts" table for terms, metrics, or specifications
- Include a short FAQ section with direct, 1-2 sentence answers
Upgrade for evidence:
- Add citation-ready statistics with source URLs
- Include expert quotes with full attribution
- Replace adjectives with numbers wherever possible
Format for machines:
- Use numbered lists for processes
- Use bullet lists for features or options
- Use tables for comparisons
Off-page checklist: be visible where AI looks
Your website is one surface. AI engines also pull from:
- Communities: Reddit threads, industry forums, Quora answers
- Comparison content: "Best X" listicles, product roundups, G2/Capterra reviews
- Media mentions: Press coverage, guest posts, expert roundups
- Directories: Industry-specific listings, business profiles
Treat this as distribution engineering, not "content promotion." The goal is to be referenced in places the AI already trusts, so your brand shows up in multiple training and retrieval contexts.
How do you measure GEO without fooling yourself?
This is where most teams get stuck.
A thread in r/SEO captures the frustration: "...we have no reliable method of tracking if our efforts worked."
The honest answer: GEO measurement is messier than traditional SEO. But it's not impossible.
What you can track:
- AI referral traffic: In GA4, filter for referrers from chat.openai.com, perplexity.ai, bing.com (Copilot), etc.
- Citation sampling: Keep a fixed "query set" (10-20 prompts in your category) and sample monthly. Same prompts, same settings, same models.
- Conversion from AI sources: Track whether AI referrals convert differently than organic search
What's still broken:
SEO.com notes: "While impressions, clicks, and average position data from AI Overviews enters Google Search Console, it's not filterable." You can't isolate AI Overview performance cleanly — yet.
The practical approach:
Accept variance as noise, not signal. AI answers change based on phrasing, time of day, and model updates. Don't optimize for a single prompt result. Optimize for being citable across a category, then measure aggregate referral traffic over months.
GEO vs SEO vs AEO: what changes, what stays
Three acronyms. One question: what actually matters?
| Approach | Win Condition | Primary Surface | Measurement |
|---|---|---|---|
| SEO | Rank pages; user clicks links | Search engine results pages | Rankings, clicks, CTR |
| AEO | Win direct answers and featured snippets | Google's answer boxes | Position zero, snippet capture |
| GEO | Get selected and cited in generated answers | AI answers across engines | AI referrals, citation presence |
GEO doesn't replace SEO. Good SEO (crawlability, relevance, authority) is prerequisite for being in the candidate set. GEO changes the win condition and expands the battlefield.
Google Search Central confirms: "There are no additional requirements to appear in AI Overviews." Translation: fundamental SEO still matters. GEO adds a layer — making content citable — but doesn't replace the foundation.
Should you block LLM crawlers?
Some brands are blocking AI crawlers to "protect their content." Is that the right call?
The tradeoff is simple: blocking may prevent extraction, but it also prevents citation. If your brand is already invisible to AI, blocking makes you more invisible.
A discussion in r/bigseo captures the practitioner view: "Blocking their websites will do more harm."
Treat this as a business decision, not a philosophical one. If AI answers are a distribution channel you want to win, blocking is self-sabotage. If you're a paywalled publication with a different model, the calculus changes.
For most brands trying to grow visibility, the answer is: don't block.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GEO just SEO with a new name?
Many fundamentals overlap, but GEO targets selection and citations in generated answers — not just rankings. The mechanisms (chunk-level selection, answer synthesis) and the measurement loop differ enough that treating them as identical leads to blind spots.
Do citations and statistics actually help you get cited?
Yes. The arXiv GEO study found that adding citations, quotations, and statistics increased visibility by over 40% across queries in their experiments. Evidence beats adjectives.
Can I optimize specifically for Google AI Overviews?
Google's documentation states there are no special optimizations required. The play is strong fundamentals: clarity, structure, and information that directly answers questions.
How do I track GEO if AI answers keep changing?
Use referral traffic from AI platforms (GA4) plus a fixed query set you sample monthly. Practitioners report measurement frustration is real — accept variance as noise and measure aggregate trends, not individual prompts.
Does GEO traffic actually convert?
Early evidence suggests yes. Go Fish Digital reported a 25X higher conversion rate from AI-driven leads compared to traditional search. Users who arrive via AI citations may have higher intent.
Should I block AI crawlers?
If you want to be cited, blocking is usually self-sabotage. Practitioners in r/bigseo generally argue blocking does more harm than good for visibility.
The bottom line
GEO is how you engineer visibility in the age of AI answers. The mechanism is selection — AI engines parse your content, decide whether to include you in the candidate set, and then choose whether to cite you in the answer.
The levers are:
- Evidence: Citations, quotes, and statistics make your content machine-reusable
- Structure: Clear headings, Q&A blocks, and tables make extraction easy
- Multi-surface authority: Being visible across the web — not just your site — builds the trust that gets you cited
Your goal isn't a better blog post. Your goal is to be visible everywhere AI looks, so the model has no choice but to cite you.
Check if your brand appears in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews →
Get our monthly AI Search Updates →